This didn't seem right to me, so I tabulated the Family Type and Employment variable in the 2006-2010 sample of the American Community Sample (having a laptop with flash memory is pretty awesome--it allowed me to do it in about five minutes).
Here are the results:
Household Type ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? # of Households ? ? ? ? % 0f Households
Married Couple, both in labor force| ? ? ? ? ? 22,309,285 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 41.16 ? ? ?
Married Couple, only man in labor force ? ? ?8,792,744 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 16.22 ? ? ?
Married Couple, only woman in labor force 2,933,758 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?5.41 ? ? ?
Married Couple, neither in labor force ? ? ? ? ?6,473,742 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?11.94 ? ? ?
Male only, in labor force ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 2,848,830 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?5.26 ? ? ?
Male only, not in labor force ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?720,066 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?1.33 ? ? ?
Female only, in labor force ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?7,230,003 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?13.34 ? ? ?
Female only, not in labor force ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 2,890,776 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 5.33 ? ?
I am guessing that most retailers know and understand the implications of a country where only 16 percent of households have housewives (in the traditional sense of the word), but perhaps they are not.
Source: http://real-estate-and-urban.blogspot.com/2012/11/who-is-doing-shopping.html
photos doomsday clock nate robinson sharia law sharia law new hampshire primary results molly sims
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.